After much detailed study of the limited historical information that survives today, we are confident that there was nearly-certainly some sort of ‘kinship relationship’ between the Crispins and the ducal house – whether a direct, male-line descent from Rollo the Viking, or perhaps a link through marriage or half-blood.
- mingle2 dating site
- Fuck live indan hot chat
- Raleigh sex chat line
- dating montreal english
- dating rules parents have
- updating sprint prl
- bang dating place
It has taken nine years of very meticulous and painstaking research by two brothers, in their spare time, to discover and put all of this material together.
We have carefully questioned a great many uncertain facts to ensure our findings are as accurate as possible, within the limitations of historical documents that still exist.
(According to Master Wace’s Chronicle of the Norman Conquest, written in the mid-1100s).
The Wormley family were a male-line, cadet branch of the Yorkshire Newmarches of Bentley, Arksey and Womersley, who were direct paternal descendants of the Crispins.
Previously, Christian names alone had been considered all that people needed, but this was becoming increasingly confusing and impractical for adequate identification.
There is strong, although not conclusive, historical evidence that the Crispins may have been members of the family of the first dukes of Normandy, or had a close connection with them.
In other words they were all one continuous family, but changed their ‘surname’ twice – from Crispin to Newmarch in around 1130AD, for reasons of marriage and inheritance, and again later from Newmarch to Wormley in the 13 century.
There was nothing strange about this fluidity in that period, when surnames were being invented and first coming into use.
The Domesday Book records that Robert held Whatton in the Vale, near Nottingham, of Gilbert de Gand in 1086.